HABIB-UL-HAQ versus SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB, COMMUNICATION AND WORKS DEPARTMENT, LAHORE
RR 3 (1), 8 (1) (A) (2) and 23 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 18 Regulating the Service Ad hoc and direct appointments of seniority, appointing appellant have already been chosen on an optional basis. Was gone and later they were. Regularized, while the respondents were direct appointees, please take action by the appellant was that since their selection / joining was premature in the department, they were senior to the respondents, though the appointment of the appellants was for the respondents. Was premature but it was a declaration of hockey and their services could not be counted during the ad hoc period. Appellant should have regularized his services in the formal order of the Punjab Public Service Commission during the regular period, which He did not enter the appellants at the beginning of the. Knowing that his ad hoc appointments would not have any right to a regular appointment, even ad hoc appointment of appellant without merit, etc., as a result of the Prime Minister's five-point program, under the record of hiring non-employed engineers. It has become clear that before the issuance of the notification / appointment letter, the appellants were given ad hoc appointments, the appellants were aware that the Chief Minister had given summary to the selectors of the Punjab Public Service Commission for regularization of his services. More juniors were approved. Respondents had included appellant in their appointment letter in regular service with full knowledge of the condition that the competent authority had banned their seniority. Regarding the respondents and notwithstanding such condition, the appellants had accepted the letter of appointment and on a regular basis
