AWAMI LABOUR UNION SUPPER GAS, PEARL GAS, DHURNAL FILLING PLANT, SHV, ENERGY PAKISTAN PVT. LIMITED versus CHIEF EXECUTIVE, SHV ENERGY PAKISTAN PVT. LIMITED
Section 41 and 55 Transfer of Employees' Request for Complaints to Work From One Place, Appeal to Appellate Tribunal Employees Who Have Been Moved from Work to Place `I their lodge a complaint against them for such transfer. , Which was rejected by the Labor Court. Legitimate property had submitted annual audit reports / financial statements in relation to the relevant years, proving that their company was located at the place I place due to a decrease in demand for their products due to the current situation in the area. ? This fact was also acknowledged by the General Secretary of the Trade Union, just to prove the fact that the transfer of employees was in place P, in such a situation only the employer could determine that What was financial and he had the right to reorganize the organization and retrieve its employees directly, in this case, they were shown to be fair to each employee and they had their place in the transfer orders. \ I expressed my inability to continue working for the company and offered a broader set of terms for employees to comply with. Or. The whole stand of the employees was false and baseless with their exchange orders and on the spot, while the employers' position was correct and fair, the employees should comply with the transfer orders and The defense had no justification for whatever Labor decision it had. The court was well argued and did not find any defects or defects in it, appeal cannot be interrupted. \ R \ n
