Sections 302 (6) / 34 and 324/34 of the Martyrs (10 of 1984), Arts 46, 47 and 131 Criminal Procedure Code (v. 1898), Section 512, examining the evidence of the conviction of Qatl Eimd and Qatil Umt. The evidence of the eyewitness testimony in the form of an inquiry was convincing evidence, which in strange facts and circumstances the court may legally consider, but with the added caution and caution that both courts have already taken. , Since the above evidence is fully corroborated by the medical evidence and the circumstances surrounding this case. Legally and technically the above examination cannot be stated in the strict sense under Section 512, CRPC, nor is the appellate court in the matter affected. The verdict may have been held, but the fact is that the way the proceedings in the case were postponed, the star witnesses of the incident repeatedly had to appear in court for their evidence, under which circumstances the Chief of the Chief Witness The interview was filed before the trial court, the defendant's conduct and his counsel in court, still could not take advantage of the opportunity to cross-examine for more than a month and three hearing dates. In order to give the accused the benefit of such a delay in the proceedings of the session case, the material facts could not be ignored which in the case of his chief inspection, the evidence of the eyewitness could not be ruled out by the simple suggestion that he Was not crossed. The test, since the accused had deliberately and calculatedly avoided taking advantage of the opportunity, had to make a distinction between the two cases, a place where no party was given the opportunity to pass the test or
