The complainant's ocular testimony and any other witness cannot be removed simply by examining the evidence in Sections 302 (b) / 149, 324/149 and 148 because the accused had background of any enmity with the party. ? The witnesses suffered injuries in the incident and after giving their presence and thus giving their testimony, there was no doubt, all the accused and the injured witnesses were staying in the village and they were criminals. The lawsuit was closed, the accused knew and could easily identify the number of people affected and the number of injured indicated that the number of suspects had increased despite the eight accused. Was not, therefore, not open to any exceptions. The suspects, the brothers aimed directly at revenge for the murder of their brothers, who used 12 bore guns in the incident, to clear thirteen crime sites where they were recovered from the spot. In this case, the two accused, as confirmed by the private witnesses and the facts available on the record, confirmed the incident was a brutal, brutal and brutal display of human negligence and the accused was somehow Did not deserve mercy or the punishment of the gentleman and the punishment of the accused was retained
