Find a Lawyer

SHI RAZ-UL-HAQ versus STATE

Section 365 (XXVII of the Anti-Terrorism Act of 1997), sections 6 (1) (b) and 7 (e) for automatic ransom conviction for ransom, reduction of the prosecution's testimony that witnessed the abduction incident This aspect of has not been tested. The trial and the only victim's evidence was that the accused did not receive ransom money. The prosecutor further alleged that the accused used credit and debit card and the money was withdrawn from the victims' accounts but no clear evidence from the bank officials. The evidence was not presented. To prove such a charge that the victim was only two days in which there was no allegation of torture, the trial court had sentenced the three accused to death which the High Court had justified, therefore, in such cases. I was sentenced to death. Three people were severely punished

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2010

• MUHAMMAD IBRAHIM v. AHMED ALI 2010 SCMR 637
• Subedar (Retd.) ABDUL MAJEED v. MULAZIM HUSSAIN SHAH 2010 SCMR 641
• SECTION OFFICER, GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB, FINANCE DEPARTMENT v. GHULAM SHABBIR 2010 PLC(CS) 641
• ARBAB TASLEEM v. State 2010 PLD 642
• HAJI v. State 2010 SCMR 650
• HASSAN AKHTAR v. AZHAR HAMEED 2010 PLD 657
• MUHAMMAD AHMAD (MAHMOOD AHMED) v. State 2010 SCMR 660
• BASHIR AHMAD v. ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE, FAISALABAD 2010 PLD 661

All Supreme Court judgments of 2010 →

immigration advocates from Doaaba lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes