SECTION OFFICER, GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB, FINANCE DEPARTMENT versus GHULAM SHABBIR
R 3 5, Note I ESTACODE, 2003 Edition (Punjab), page 690 Response to Leave Preparation for Retirement The respondent was an employee of the bank who applied for voluntary retirement and prepared for retirement. After receiving a nearly ailed full timeline, the employees withdrew their retirement option but the employees were not allowed to withdraw the retirement option, but under the constitutional jurisdiction, the High Court directed the bank to allow the employees to retire. Allow withdrawal option The bank acknowledged his retirement acceptance on 16 December 2006, 2006, with the fact that the employee had submitted the application for withdrawal of his voluntary retirement on May 6, 2007, just five days before his actual retirement. 2006 took advantage of the 2006 order. And he mentioned the required date of retirement as on 30 6 2007, 19 5 2008, the competent authority was dismissed on his request for a resignation with immediate reasons as per the terms of the law. Edit, Employees were unable to identify any kind of illegality. In a bank-approved order, the High Court accepted the constitutional petition filed by the employees without the relevant rules of this article. The Supreme Court, which was approved by the High Court, was set aside, while the order of 19 5, 2008 was upheld by the authorities. The appeal was allowed.
