Performed by execution of Section 39 of the Punjab Pre-Emission Act (I of 1913), Section 6 of the Civil Procedure Code (V8 1908), OII, R2, O III, R4 and OXXIII, R1 (3). Cancellation of a Sales Sales Trial by the Claimant Before the Closing of the Case filed by the Plaintiff to the extent of cancellation of the Claim Return Agreement by the alleged solicitor and alternatively pre-arrest The second case was dismissed by the trial court for dismissal by OXX XXII, R 1 (3) and O II, R 2, for not pressing relief on his lawyer's statement. , CP Trial or maintained by such decisions to the claimant first and second apyltyt courts, the Court was not competent lawyer. Making such a statement, as such, did not preclude another case. The accuracy record revealed that not only did the plaintiff represent the plaintiff after the dismissal of the claim in the first case related to the sale case, but also filed a second lawsuit, which shows that the lawyer's consent and consent of the plaintiff Worked with, which was subject to his actions, the lawyer's attorney authorized him to make such a statement, including the option of the plaintiff to settle the matter or to arbitrate the case, the Supreme Court appealed against the anonymous decision. Refused to leave
