The natural review ocular testimony for the assessment of Section 2 302 (b) value was consistent and reliable on all material details. The truth, in the absence of any motive by them for the false interference of the accused in this case, occurred at 8.30am, 30 minutes, the presence of prosecution witnesses at the scene of the incident is not open to any doubt. Was. Injury by the prosecution, which belonged to the other accused, will not itself be a negative intervention against him, along with medical evidence, as well as the recovery of a gun on the occasion of the accused. Protected by chance, supported the ocular evidence, and the motive behind the incident was that the acquittal partner was not prosecuted, according to the record, which also distinguished the current accused, who was confessional and straightforward. The evidence was beyond any doubt, no record of justification was given to convict the perpetrator of life imprisonment, who committed the crime. Cold blooded murder was dismissed on appeal by the prosecution
