Article 188 Review of decisions or orders by the principles of the Supreme Court has been found on the basis of some new point of view that was not possible to be diligently, not necessarily a revision application where neither new nor important matter. Or proof has been discovered, nor is there any error or omission apparent on the face of the record. Such an error may not be a fact or a mistake of law, but it must be self-evident and floating on the surface. There is no need for extensive discussion or critique. Orders based on a misconception of material facts, or without the suppression of any provision of law, or departing from an unconstitutional construction of law and constitution, on the other hand, should be erroneous; The fate of the case is obvious but it must also have a material impact and not unnecessary import if a decision is found or found, though misunderstanding is present. The facts, based on other records available on the record, are not valid even though the error appears on the face of the record not valid where the review order was not damaged due to any error on the record face, and Neither the other good and the reasons for reviewing the order were given, review of the applications should be dismissed.
