ABDUL AZIZ versus AZAD GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY, MUZAFFARABAD
Sections 4, 11, 18 and 23 Land Acquisition Determination of Compensation Where land was essentially acquired, the proprietor's return to the land in return was compensated, not the market value, Different matters have to be considered under section 23. Under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, when assessing the value of a property for collection or settlement by the court, one of the factors was the very broad meaning of the word \ compensation \ means compensation means equilibrium, equilibrium. To perform. Weighing one thing against another, but that does not mean that weighing copper against gold cannot be compensated without the need for an equal amount of money at the time of notification under section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The market value of the land was merely an absolute yardstick for methods of compensation assessment and not an absolute yardstick for assessing compensation, but various issues had to be considered while the primary duty of the court to assess the probability of assessing the property was to assess the value of the property. Had to take into account the factors determining the market value of the land only for a period at or at the time of notification issuance. This period could be related to, but not only the average cost schedule for 3 years or even a year to determine the amount of compensation in the future, but also the other content brought in that regard. Relatively enough, the average price of a year's land can be taken as a relative consideration of the same place or classification, nature and nature of the land, but not absolute where the lands were not transferred through mutual negotiation, On the contrary, under the rule of the state, it was honored and awarded the land
Related judgments — Supreme Court Azad Kashmir, 2010
