MILITARY ESTATE OFFICER, HAZARA CIRCLE versus CH. MANZOOR HUSSAIN
Sections 4, 11, 18, 23 and 54 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act (VIII of 1974), Section 42 Determination of Acquisition Compensation Reference Referred to the Court Appeal to the Respondents / Landlords of the Supreme Court Compensation of the land acquired by the Collector Land Acquisition filed a reference before the referee court, which found dissatisfaction with the referee court's findings while raising the cost of land, authorities dismissed the High Court's appeal by the High Court. Subsequently, the authorities filed an appeal to the Supreme Court against the High Court land decision, which put the question on both sides of the main road. Raf was a commercial land and part of the land was located within the limits of the municipality and adjoining shops was said to have been denied by the authorities. Verbal and documentary evidence on the record fully justified the value of this market. The underground land was sufficiently high. The Authority said that there was no evidence to deny the evidence. In answer to the question, the conclusions on the question of fact relating to the market value of the land, the price fixed by the referee court, the High Court. Maintained, not to read any false statements or evidence by the courts below when any false If it is committed to read the evidence or not, then when the facts were pointed out by the counsel of the authorities through advice, unless some false statement or evidence was read, the second appeal Will not lie And considering the second appeal, the Supreme Court will not accept the fresh definition of evidence, even if after the dismissal of the appeal, the wrong attitude was taken by the courts.
Related judgments — Supreme Court Azad Kashmir, 2010
