Section 42D Independent powers of the Jammu and Kashmir Supreme Court (Review Options) Act, 1980, Section 2 Amendment powers by the Supreme Court Rules, 1978, AXLVII, R 1, SC 1, to the Supreme Court. Power to review your decision, if any error or omission was made before the record, or words for any good reason, for any reason sufficient and sufficient for the Supreme Court to review its decision without hesitation. If the court is satisfied that the decision has been concluded. Or the order under consideration was not legal or just one. And the same issue can lead to injustice with the legal rights of any party, in such a case, as full justice and greatness of the court, the review by other courts for contempt of the principle of law, was justified. Civil cases were more widespread than criminal cases. In a civil case, if an error or omission has been made on the face of the record or a demand for a more appropriate cause is reviewed, then the jurisdiction of the review can be exercised to prevent injustice, But it will depend on the facts and circumstances of each case. In the present case, the decision to consider the definition of important, robust documentary evidence was not discussed. Rather, the verdict was utterly silent in that regard, which clearly proved that there was no authentic evidence by the court, thus indicating that the material evidence was in the course of the delivery of the judgment under review. Was not considered and not appreciated which was a good reason for approving the review. Request reviewed
Related judgments — Supreme Court Azad Kashmir, 2010
