SAFDAR ALI KHAN versus AZAD GOVERNMENT OF THE JAMMU AND KASHMIR THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY
A. VIII, R2 and Section 100 Arbitration Act (X of 1940), Sections 17 and 30 of the Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act (VII of 1974), Section 42 (11) (d) Trial Arbitration Procedure The defendants filed their written statement. The parties agreed to the appointment of the arbitrator, the trial court appointed the arbitrator, who presented his report in the presence of a lawyer for the parties, and none of them filed an objection to the arbitrator's report / award. In the award case, the judgment and decree have been approved and dismissed. The suit, however, found through the trial court that the maximum payment was made to the plaintiff. To the extent that the plaintiff's appeal was overturned, the plaintiff's High Court amended the judgment and decree while the judgment and injunction were retained after the award was entered by the arbitrator, the plaintiff in his Did not object to the award. A fixed period of thirty days under Article 158 of the Limitation Act, 1908, but filed beyond that period, and no legal basis was mentioned, was stated by the trial court as a decision of the court. The arbitration award was presented correctly. The second appeal was limited only to the grounds stated in section 100; the CPC had failed to establish a valid basis in accordance with the plaintiff's legal provisions; two facts were resolved by the plaintiff simultaneously on the factual facts. Refused to interfere with the quest for written sync. By subordinate courts
Related judgments — Supreme Court Azad Kashmir, 2010
