DR. ABDUL GHAFFAR SULEHRIA versus AZAD GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY
Section 4 Azad Jammu and Kashmir Service Tribunal (Code of Conduct), 1976, R 8 Applying before the Service Tribunal The imposition of the necessary parties shall mean the term `` authority, '' any person or authority capable of appointing a public servant. ; Or one such designation for action against public servants under the Azad Jammu and Kashmir (Performance and Discipline) Rule 1977. It also includes state officials who can finally determine any right, term or condition of a public servant before an appeal can be filed by a public servant who has suffered a final order before the Service Tribunal. Whether original or appealed by a department. Appeal of Authority and its Memorandum Appellant had to enforce the competent authority as the first respondent. And then the parties to this dispute should be prepared like other respondents. In the present case, the government's order of development of the respondents was approved, which is the only authorized authority. In the words of R8 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Service Tribunal (Code of Conduct) 1976, only two respondents were mentioned who had passed the final order in respect of the terms and conditions of service in the Appellate Authority. Were. The first responders and other parties to this dispute should be the second group of respondents who had some complaints about the seniority and publicity selection committee or the selection committee in relation to the dispute, which were not factual. Alternatives to the Public Service Commission, which were all mainly recommendation agencies, whose recommendations
Related judgments — Supreme Court Azad Kashmir, 2010
