Sections 10 (4) and 11 commit adultery and compel the accusation of efficacy and the definition of evidence of kidnapping, beyond the benefit of the doubt, to hold a group of money liable to the accused and to create a nexus of crime. Was not made for, there were some significant contradictions and contradictions. The statement of the complainant complaining to the extent of the accused in the case of the trial did not inspire confidence; he stated in his own investigation that he Seeing her daughter naked while her hands were tied, the Victim girl didn't even say such a word. The complainant stated that apart from the two accused, no one else was present at the relevant time, but the victim cited the presence of two other unidentified persons who stood there as guards, the complainant's two real brothers, It was also questionable why the victim's victim / daughter's search, which did not appear as a prosecution witness to confirm their version, was also questionable as to why the incident lasted approximately 9 hours. Continued and the accused and his accompanying partner waited until the arrival of the complaining party while in their affidavits The complainant and his victim's daughter were acquitted of the allegations and had no objection. If they were acquitted of the allegations, then the contents of the statements were affirmed by the counsel of the affidavit's contents, he made it clear It was said that the accused was innocent and did not abduct the girl nor committed adultery with his crime, although this was not acceptable, statements were made along with statements.
