Section 396 Crimes against Property (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VI of 1979), Section 17 (4) The prosecution for the murder and recovery of robbery, pistols, ammunition and stolen gold jewelry from Haraba substantially by the evidence of the witness Was proved. The investigating officer, who assisted in all material details, was found guilty by one of the prosecution witnesses, who was the prosecutor. The witness had complied with all the formal proceedings of the law before recording the confession. The confessional statement itself showed the conditions that according to Section 6464 by (), the CCP had fulfilled during the recording of such statement, no error was identified in the recording of the confessional statement. And no systematic irregularities were found in the recording of the confession offense, otherwise the explicit value of the confession cannot be regulated. The defendant and the prosecution's other witnesses identified the accused, violated the law by a lawyer accused of conducting an identity parade, as was the case and effective. Could not be identified, except that the identification was delayed by six days. The parade was not always fatal in the litigation case, in the case of the identity parade's identity value, no arrest could be made on the basis of delay and no error in the identification parade, and the trial court did the same. Depending on which killed the victim was enough. Evidence from a doctor who conducted a post-mortem examination on the body of a dead pistol, recovered from a co-accused.
