MIAN ABDUR RAZZAQ AAMIR versus FEDERAL GOVERNMENT OF ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF PAKISTAN
Sections 9, 48, 49 and 51 of the Counter Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Article 25 and 21 of the Constitution related to Pakistan Hood and consequently any order, final or interim which includes denial of bail or bail. , Under any law, special or general, any law, under any law, has been approved for a crime related to Hood, and this Shariah is within the jurisdiction of the court and no one else. The court, including a High Court, guarantees or has the power to appeal or amend any case. The Federal Shariah Court directed that appropriate amendments be made to the Articles 48 and 49 of the Drug Substances Act, 1997, to restore jurisdiction. In addition to the constitutional amendment of the Federal Shariah Court in matters relating to the enforcement of the HUDD, no legal instrument can restrict or override the exclusive jurisdiction of the Federal Law. The court is required under Article 203 DD of the Constitution. Similarly, if an offense of nature of Hood ood is prosecuted under the Anti-Terrorism Act 1997, it is appealed in all such matters under section 25 of the said Act, or A guarantee in this case may be granted under Section 21D of the above. The Act will lie before the Federal Shariah Court, and not the Federal Law Court of the High Court directed that two steps be taken to justify the matter for the words of the High Court found in section 48 (i). Federal law will be changed. 49 (i) The Control of Narcotic Material Stances Act 1997, and that Article 25 of the Anti-Terrorism Act 1997 requires a rider to state that an appeal in matters relating to Hood should be lied to the Federal Shariah Court.
