Section 7 337 J / Off 34 Offenses Hurt (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), Section 10 (2) is hurt by poison and fornication, which can be interpreted as evidence to the benefit of doubt. In filing an FIR explaining the delay of one month and 23 days, which led to the prosecution's case being suspected, the complainant did not present any independent witness to prove the case, the lady accused to the lady doctor. Nearly three months after the alleged incident was presented to the Medical Examiner, the Lady Doctor commented that the accused had recently been sued by the Lady Examiner, Chemical Examiner. AH with the medico-legal report after receiving positive feedback reports were given, ID value was lost, in these circumstances, the complainant and the accused woman / Complaint relationship between a wife. He had left the complainant's house and filed a lawsuit against the complainant's trial court for dissolving the marriage by opening a case against the prosecuting judge, who, on the basis of his conviction, the chemical executor Based on medical evidence and reports. Any direct or indirect evidence or circumstance or to confirm that the incident was conducted through the prosecution case was that the female accused of engaging in a male suspect had poisoned / poisoned the complainant. As a result, the complainant was knocked unconscious, but not the evidence contradicted the record by the prosecutor, statements of both star witnesses created suspicion in the prosecution and the story as related to the incident. In R, one of the accused was sentenced
