MIAN HAMMAD MURTAZA versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY JUSTICE AND PARLIAMENTARY AFFAIRS, ISLAMABAD
Challenges to Sections 3 (1) (2) (3) and 4 of the West Pakistan Family Courts Act, 1964, representing the involvement of sections 3 (1) (2) (3) and 4 of the Constitution of Pakistan, Article 203 D Islam Petition. The reason for this was that the applicant was rejected by the Quran and the Sunnah's significant intention that a woman could not act as a judge / judge or arbitrator and she would not be able to go to court in relation to family matters. Was not able to settle matters. On the contrary and asserted that a Muslim ruler or head of state cannot appoint a woman with the authority to record the evidence of the parties as a judge / judge. And despite the opportunity to decide the cases between the applicants, the Qur'an could not cite any specific `NASS to support this request to appoint a woman as a judge / judge. The applicant did not challenge any specific law. And he did not cite any involvement in Islam under which a woman was barred from holding a judge's petition. \ r \ n
