Attempt to be found guilty under the section 18 Enforcement of Hood (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance, 1979. The parents of the complainant / victim were considered unnatural and thoughtful about compromising the definition of evidence, and it was not possible that after the tragedy of two persons being gang-raped, the victim and her parents remained mother for many days and They could not report it. The victim immediately told police in the FIR that after committing the adultery, the accused escaped when witnesses arrived on the spot. And then she got up and put on her shawl, but her brother, as a prosecution witness, submitted the statement that his mother and brother's wife had arrived at the scene and they had put clothes on the body of the victim. Put in. The witness was cited, though several test victims said they had multiple homes around the house, but no one came close to support the version of the Complaints Investigation Officers, the accused person said. Was found innocent and prosecuted under the C \ Class recommended for its remediation, but still, on the basis of some evidence, the defendants were charged under the Zena Crime (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance, 1979. Under 18 the Investigation Officers were challaned by the Lady Doctor who conducted the test. The victim was sent to the Chemical Examiner with a vaginal swab, but the report indicated that no semen was found in the pills, the trial court did not believe the story of the victim related to the GA. Used to Under Section 18 of the Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance, 1979, the offenders were subjected to torture, but fornication
