GHULAM MUHAMMAD versus THE STATE THROUGH POLICE STATION, SKARDU
Section 2 302 (b) Qatiel appreciated the evidence, the increase in convictions was open and closed, the prosecutor included witnesses who were very natural in describing the circumstances of their case, and their statements under section 161 But had not improved. , CRPC's FIR Lazarus statement, which was the real brother of the deceased, gave a factual and natural statement. In which he named the suspect and the presence near his house. It also disclosed the motive for the case, as well as saying it was not dispersed by the defense from the scene of the daylight incident with the victim, including cartridges that identified 30 suspects. The pistol was also recovered and taken into custody as evidence, the statement of the independent witness who supported the litigation case was not denied in any way, the empty shell was recovered as well. The 30 bore pistol was sent to the Franzac Science Laboratory, which was decided. In his statement under Section 342, the suspect and the same pistol were extracted from the suspect, the CCP pleaded that the victim had obtained a weapon in front of a plot on the side of the road and that the accused had used the same. Had tried to And the fatal gunshot wound to the elephant resulted in the death of the deceased, a direct statement of the accused is a far cry. If such a statement of the accused was completely rejected, the accused could not be excused from the crime. The trial court's record was against the case, which was dealt with gently by the trial court and there was no mitigating circumstance, where section 2302 (b)
