SAEED FAQIR versus GOVERNMENT OF GILGIT-BALTISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY TRANSPORT AND TOURISM AFFAIRS GILGIT-BALTISTAN
Article 71 (2) of the General Clause Act (X of 1897), the section 23 writ petition civil service retirement petitioners was appointed under the Rules of Service and stated that the retirement age of employees under RL 25 was reduced to 60 years. As the Empire Corporation set 60 years. Under the new Rules of Service and the R25 section of these new rules, the retirement age is changed to 55 years or 25 years of regular service. It said the new rules were immediately enforced and many employees were retired under an improper order, assuming the rules had an impact. No year and date of enforcement was mentioned in the introduction of the new rules; implicit rules were not set in violation of section 23 of the General Clause Act 1897 as there were no proposed rolls for information on the victims. Draft was not published. No notice was submitted for objections or suggestions, the new rules, after being implemented immediately, could not be made a pretext for retiring employees have been posted under the old rules Employer Corporation New Rules of Service Rules Disappointment of 25 cannot give effect because the applicants serving under the Applicants Rules of 1974 have the right to serve at least 25 applicants. Years and previous rules were given 60 years as the age of retirement; any amendments introduced or amended in the Service Rules principle could not be retired with retroactive effect in favor of individuals already. Delegated rights cannot be allowed. Under the rules
