PAKISTAN/PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT GILGIT-BALTISTAN, GILGIT versus KACHO FIDA MUHAMMAD
Sections 4, 11, 18, 23 and 54 Determination of compensation amount The respondents / landlords in respect of the referee court whose land was acquired were dissatisfied with the amount paid by the collector; the amount of compensation under protest. Received and filed. By objection under section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, their protest referee court demanded an increase in the amount of compensation up to 15% compulsory charges and 8% interest till the receipt of the money, authorities appealed. / Landlords filed their verdict through oral evidence along with documentary evidence, while appellant / authorities failed to dismiss the issue of compensation increase, officials acknowledged that the landlord was 8% He did not claim compound interest and 15% required acquisition compensation, he could not be returned, which was repaid. As a point, the Land Acquisition Act is associated with the mandatory provisions of 1894, under which 8% of compound interest cannot be denied, even if the owners likewise waive 15% of the required compensation. Also cannot be withheld from awards or increased funds under the law.
