Section 302 (b) Counter-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Sections 6, 7 and 21H of the West Pakistan Arms Ordinance (XX of 1965), Section 13 (d) of the AMD, definition of evidence relating to terrorism and possession of arms. After the incident was not possible, his name did not appear in the replacement of the two vacant FIRs, which was not possible, which was found at the scene and witnessed the statements of witnesses listed under Section 161, CR PC. Was sealed in presence. Also, the statements made by the Judicial Magistrate authorized under Section 1641, CRPC, did not face any defect. Before the recording of such statements, all possible legal rituals were completed. Such statements were voluntary and the true identification parade was a highly credible and non-binding one. The biased system did. Assistant Commissioners are completing all the juices of the identity parade in the presence of witnesses, who were dismissed in favor of the prosecution and their workers, and things were not shattered by the defense. Such an incident provided strong intent against the accused. And had proven the case against him and said that the piece of evidence is a strong link in the commission of the defense The defense has failed to record any situation under which it can be considered. In addition to the motive presented by the prosecutor, who was involved in the case on the basis of his intention against the accused, the prosecution succeeded in convicting the accused to be punished. And nothing was available to indicate that the decision passed by the trial court was based on an error of law or contrary to the principles established by the judicial view. Or b in any way
