Section 302 (b) Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Section 7 (a) West Pakistan Arms Ordinance (XX of 1965), Section 13 (d) Definition of evidence related to murder, terrorism and possessing weapons in this case. In the meantime, it was not possible to find the timely, fake documents and evidence that the FIR could not be recorded well over time, in which the role of the accused was clear in this area as well as in the area of the incident. I was also where the murder took place, there was no room for error detection The motivator did not challenge the defendant's recovery of the crime weapon after the incident and neither refused. Was not fully contested by the defense, medical reports proved that the deceased's death was a result of the fire, with shots fired from a 12 bore shotgun, pointing to eyewitnesses and proved by expert opinion. It was reported that the FIR immediately shows the names of witnesses registered, how to use the crime weapon and the manner in which the incident occurred with the intention that there was no possibility of misidentification of the defense. There was no suggestion made by the source that it is believed that the accused would falsely meet the accused at the time of commission of the crime. Was. Within a good time, the recovery from the accused proved that the witnesses were of course dead, but the evidence of their presence at the time of the incident justified the record. The accused has committed the crime. In 1955, he was convicted of a murder and sentenced. It seemed that the accused was a habitual offender and his former behavior was not very helpful in the present case.
