Section 302/324/34 Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Section 6/7/21 H West Pakistan Arms Ordinance (XX 1965), Section 13 (d) Qatil-e-Amal, Qatel AMD attempt to commit, terrorism And the testimony of the recovered arms was appreciated over time and the contents of the FIR have revealed the names of the injured, the accused and the witnesses, the FIR said in the FIR statement regarding these facts. Has also used this crime. The case was very natural and the trust was impressive. During cross-examination, minor improvements were brought to the record, which were not in a hurry to break the authenticity of the witnesses, it was quite natural for the witness to testify. The accused and the same witness belonged to the area to identify a person in the dark with the headlights of the vehicle and no question of misidentification was raised. In his trial in the trial court, the injured witness fully supported the prosecution. ? ase The other two witnesses were completely exonerated against the accused and the role played by them was identified as the weapons used by the accused for the commission of the crime, whose two main recovered witnesses Had proven the recovery of weapons used by the accused. The witnesses were neutral policemen who did not belong to the area and had no ax to grind, which did not encounter any weakness in the preparation of recovery notes. The blank shells were similar to the weapons used in the crime. The incident against him was proved. The issue of communal hatred between the parties when the complainant and the accused took place near the murder of the party and Goa
