Sections 302, 365 A & 34 of the Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Section 7 conviction for kidnapping and ransom benefit of his murder and was awarded death sentence by the trial court. In prosecution, the prosecution's story was created on who and when the deceased's body was taken, and when and where the body of a five-year-old juvenile's body was taken and the complainant's son Being arrested by two accused who was strangling him and demanding his ransom in the process of strangulation, it was impossible for his father to refuse immediately so that there should be some action. The throat was stopped, he may have tried to negotiate. He can plead for mercy, but it was highly unlikely that he would refuse to use the complainant right away, considering that he did not logically receive any two lakh rupees; he denied it in two words. It does not matter that the complainant's conduct was highly improbable, that there were enough contradictions that created suspicion that anyone going to the person accused of committing the crime would have to go to court to prove the prosecution. Failed. In addition to any reasonable doubt, the commission of any crime by the accused was tried and sentenced by the trial court and the accused was acquitted, the appeal was allowed in the circumstances.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011
