SUS MOTORS (PVT.) LTD., KARACHI versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY REVENUE DIVISION/CHAIRMAN, ISLAMABAD
Articles 32, 79, 80 and 81 (1) (2), Articles of the Constitution of Pakistan, 199 Article Constitutional Application Transitional Release Extending the Review period Principle words exception Extraordinary circumstance Was issued after a temporary assessment and a nine-month interval, the authorities issued legal action advice against the applicant under Section 32 of the Customs Act, 1969, and the collector was required to record unusual circumstances within a period of time. The extension was guaranteed to ensure that the collector applied. In his mind and proper consideration of the same omnibus application for the relevant facts of each case, he made his decision, mechanically agreeing that the terms of compliance with section 81 (2) of the Customs Act, 1969 Was not complied with. Not extended by the authorities, as required by law, resulted in the assessment of the provisional assessment of the first time in terms of section 81 (1) of the Customs Act, 1969, which expired But the nine-month surplus amount was not included in the temporary commitment due to which the goods were temporarily released. If the determination was not fulfilled within the stipulated period, then the temporary determination was finalized and did not include any additional amount. The term was not extended in terms of validation of section 81 (2) of the Customs Act 1969 And, therefore, no final commitment was available in the nine months that ended, therefore, the temporary determination became the final applicant upon the termination of his obligation in the event of a final determination, No other payment due
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011
