PAKISTAN REFINERY LIMITED versus MASKATIYA INDUSTRIES (PVT.) LIMITED
Sections 42, 54 and 55 of the Civil Defense Act (XXXI of 1952), Section 2 of the Civil Defense (Special Powers) Rules, 1951, R10 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), AXXX, Rule 1 and 2 of the Constitution of Pakistan, Article 23 For the suit declaration, Permanent and Compulsory Order and Damage Pakistan Refinery Limited (PRL), as Kiki Point Installation 1A Kent Point Installation 1A is a 200 yard proximity installation where no structure without the prior permission of Kent Intelligence Division. Can't pick up. Inter-Services Intelligence) The temporary injunction to prevent such construction without the PPID's permission to build a private factory in close proximity to the PRL was not requested in the trial for a suitable plaintiff. In the event that the plaintiff refuses to grant permission, what will happen to him? The effect, whether the defendant compensates the defendant or receives the defendant properly with or without compensation at a market value of 200 yards away from PRL, can be decided only after the matters have been settled. Will the whole installation of PRL be considered as a key point of installation A1, or is it only the terminals the High Court has directed its Nazir to measure the actual distance? The High Court between the PRL and the defendant's factory allowed the defendant to place a boundary wall on the suit plot at his own risk so that he could avoid the encroachment, but the high court prevented him from building the factory. Settle matters and instruct the parties to resolve arguments on the legal points involved.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011
