Sections 2 (c), 9 and 10 (3bn) Recovery of Bank Loan Mickey Cadmus (Custodian), the case against the holding stock was unlawfully removed by the lenders, which was in the custody of Macadam, the parties. According to the agreement between us, the system was responsible for all damages, theft, damages, pamphlets, queries, expenses, charges, rent, measures and suits, etc. which may be incurred as a result of any equipment shortage or loss and The bank has filed a lawsuit against the borrower as well as Mickey Kudm for collecting the bank loan. After confirming that they were under lock and key under special control, Macadam executed stock reports of mortgaged goods with the borrower, which were removed, causing bank losses. There was no question of law and facts, no evidence was to be recorded in respect of which any evidence was to be recorded in relation to the suit and the status quo in favor of the bank. Until the verdict was pronounced. Price of goods graded with costs of the same fund from the date of default to the recovery suit
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011
