Section 561A Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Articles 420, 379 and 506 (2) Ordinance of Crimes (Special Courts) in relation to banks (IX of 1984), Section 2 (d) Schedule of fraud, theft, threat of prosecution The issue of citing crime. In order to overturn the order of the special court, the petition for magistrate was submitted to the special court because the offense against the accused under section 420, PPC was a fixed offense, specially heard by the special court applicants. There was a case which heard the order passed by the magistrate in his application. Filed under Section 6161A, CCPC, on the ground that the magistrate had passed an unforgivable order by misinterpreting the law, the magistrate immediately concluded that the matter was subject to the orders of the banks (special) Court) has the meaning of Article 2 (d) in the Ordinance. Appreciate the fact 1984, without appreciating the fact that in order to bring the offense within the meaning of this section, it was his responsibility to inspect whether the scheduled offense was done in time. In the present case involving a CT or a bank business it is clearly on record that in the best case of the complainant was against and / or in relation to the alleged violation of the terms and conditions of the contract. The fraud I mentioned in which the complainant's property, which was kept in mortgage with the bank, was to be sold by the complainant in favor of the person to whom the debt of the bank was satisfied. The crime was imposed, it was not done. The Ordinances of the Bank of Special Courts fall within the meaning of section 2 (d) in 1989, because neither is respected.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011
