Find a Lawyer

CONTINENTAL CABLE (PVT.) LTD. versus CHINA HARBOR ENGINEERING CO. LTD.

Section 20 Contract Act (IX of 1872), Section 126 Civil Procedure Code (VV 1908), OXXIX, Rr 1 & 2 Application for filing in a court arbitration agreement and requesting a mediator to refer the matter to the defendant The petition to prevent Ali from performing the cash is still in the process of completing the work between the bank guarantee parties until the settlement of the matter by arbitration, which the arbitrator multiplies by proof before the successful completion of the contract under the plaintiff's contract. Will need to be imposed, so the loss of such a guarantee at this time would be detrimental to it. The High Court withheld the defendant from holding such a guarantee until the case was settled before the plaintiff.

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011

• HABIBULLAH v. State 2011 MLD 1616
• MUHAMMAD ALI v. CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATION, UNIVERSITY OF KARACHI 2011 MLD 1621
• Syed MUBARIK ALI ZAIDI v. CHAIRMAN, WAPDA, WAPDA HOUSE, LAHORE 2011 PLC(CS) 1621
• SIKANDAR DADA v. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION TRIBUNAL, SINDH 2011 YLR 1623
• ADDITIONAL SECRETARY v. MUHAMMAD RAFIQUE 2011 MLD 1628
• Mst. ZAINAB v. State 2011 YLR 1628
• SAIF UR REHMAN v. XTH CIVIL JUDGE/J.M., HYDERABAD 2011 PCrLJ 1629
• ABDUL REHMAN alias ABRI v. State 2011 YLR 1631

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2011 →

best advocate from Kabir Wala lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes