Articles 2 (2 (b), & 34 & 9 109) compliment the evidence of the murder and recovery of the body of the deceased and articles of blood stained from various places, on the identity of the complainant, not reliable, punishable by its use. Could not be useful to bring in. As there was controversial material against the accused persons, it was not proved that the accused was guilty of the crime they were accused of acquiring the weapon in the presence of the complainant. Was a revolver and the accused was not related to the accused, not alone, especially when the said weapon was left unattended, for seven days. After this vague break-up of influence, no confession was made by the accused, especially in the circumstances of the case, when he delayed filing the FIR, without any excuse. The evidence of the prosecution's witnesses was unsupported by an independent independent P. For example, the trial court had seriously erred in properly examining and appreciating the evidence, and after mistakenly believing that, The accused were convicted beyond the shadow of any reasonable doubt, while no positive evidence was found against each of them, the trial court Nzur What was the decision which was not sustainable and that the accused persons were acquitted. Was charged and released
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011
