SAIF UR REHMAN versus XTH CIVIL JUDGE/J.M., HYDERABAD
Section 302 Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), section 575 requesting the registration of the AFL to terminate such an order, the petitioner's application was a complaint to the FIR, which states that The three accused had committed robbery for legally armed men. The police said that the applicant had fired at the culprits in his defense, the Judicial Magistrate passed the order registering an FIR against the applicant. Since the magistrate was of the opinion that the applicant had exceeded his defense by direct firing on the accused, he should have fired the air to provide the money. The applicant had filed an application against the applicant, according to the magistrate's justification, that may have been a matter of self-defense, but when the police learned of it, the death of two people had to be recorded by the police. And no one near or dear to the victims has come forward to file an FIR, after the FIR was registered, if the investigation revealed that the deceased had been killed by the applicant in self-defense, Still, the court had to decide. As far as exercising the right of self-defense, the FIR suspect had exceeded his or her authority, such conclusions can only be reached when the trial court deals with this case and its There could be a case at the time when an FIR was lodged by the magistrate, in the circumstances, it could not have been interfered merely because the FIR police inquiry found that the applicant had defended his right to self-defense. The accused was fired on by the High Court, as directed
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011
