Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ALI versus CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATION, UNIVERSITY OF KARACHI

Article 199 Constitutional Application Last Supplementary Examination of Educational Institutes LLB 2008 Paper 2005 or or Applicable Notification to Students Entering Period 5 5 2006 2006 videotaped No. 40 40 from each paper under vide vide 45 45 and the total number is increased from 45 45 to 50%. Applicant's submission in such examination 2 2009, the applicant's Marks Certificate has 40% passing numbers and 45% aggregate number of such University that such pass marks and cumulative numbers appearing on the certificate. There was a printing error which was allowed by the High Court and the applicant was allowed to appear in the final examination and was declared a successful university. It was delivered to the applicant on the original marks sheet of 23 9 2010, no part of the university. Deliberate and deliberate negligence was not obtained by the High Court in the circumstances dismissing the constitutional petition.

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011

• ROSHAN ALI v. S.H.O. POLICE STATION RATODERO 2011 YLR 1609
• Syed AKBAR SHAH v. MOOSO 2011 PCrLJ 1613
• SHAFQAT ALI v. GOVERNMENT OF SINDH through Chief Secretary Sindh 2011 PLC(CS) 1613
• HABIBULLAH v. State 2011 MLD 1616
• Syed MUBARIK ALI ZAIDI v. CHAIRMAN, WAPDA, WAPDA HOUSE, LAHORE 2011 PLC(CS) 1621
• SIKANDAR DADA v. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION TRIBUNAL, SINDH 2011 YLR 1623
• CONTINENTAL CABLE (PVT.) LTD. v. CHINA HARBOR ENGINEERING CO. LTD. 2011 CLD 1625
• ADDITIONAL SECRETARY v. MUHAMMAD RAFIQUE 2011 MLD 1628

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2011 →

list of supreme court advocates from Dera Nawab Sahib lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes