SYED MUBARIK ALI ZAIDI versus CHAIRMAN, WAPDA, WAPDA HOUSE, LAHORE
RR 2 (C) and 17 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitutional Application Medical treatment of Wapda employee's permanently disabled son The applicant's case was that his son, who was the victim of an accident at the age of 17, suffered permanent disability. Victim, but his medical expenses were not being financed by WAPDA Rule 17 of the WAPDA Employees Medical Attendance Rules, 1979, which served WAPDA employees, serving permanent and disabled / disabled children, Were not able to pass, regardless of their age, treatment could be allowed, however, it was provided that such treatment Ethos can be obtained only in Wapda Hospital / Dispensaries where the patient is registered. This will mean that the treatment entitlement was given only at Wapda Hospital, under section 2 (c) of all Wapda Pakistan and Wapda employees, Hospitals and dispensaries were included in the definition of "hospital". This is the Medical Attendance Rules, 1979, which will include hospitals that not only run Wapda itself, but also hospitals that were on Wapda's panel in addition to hospitals operated by Wapda. On its own, the hospitals were entitled to treatment, which was on the WAPDA panel
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011
