Sections 202 and 203 of the Special Relief Act (of 1877), for the specific performance of the contract to sell the judgment, the 12 power suit was ruled by the trial court, but the lower appellate court ruled. Excludes appeals that were raised by the plaintiff. Whether this question was related to the approval of the written statement and the power of attorney's decision on the suit property owner's decision was already taken by the High Court and not implemented, therefore, the High Court obtained the finality. Which was decided by the High Court, no forum has ever been challenged by the High Court or even before the High Court, nor has the decision been made in these appeals, therefore, The lower appellate court erred while recording the results to the contrary. In the case of a simple power of attorney in favor of the agent, the agent was obliged to seek permission to transfer the property in favor of his close relatives, but when the Atal Power of Attorney was granted the authority, it meant It was held that no interest or proprietary rights were left to the property owner of the suit property, he gave all of his rights to the lawyer and all rights of attorney were transferred to the agent's rights under the language of authority, therefore, the attorney holder. The plaintiffs' agreement with Atal's power was valid. The findings filed by the lower appellate court were intended to misinterpret the law's hypocritical and documentary evidence on the record, and it was reinstated by the High Court. Records and decisions discovered by the trial court and in the judgment and in favor of the plaintiff
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
