Sections 337J, 457, 380, 353, 109 and 411 of the Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Sections 7 and 21 of the Criminal Procedure Code (V9 1898), Section 35 hurt by poison, misconduct at home or breaking into homes. At night, residence, theft or criminal theft, fraudulently stolen property and the pursuit of terrorism, the definition of evidence proved the main suspect the mastermind of the incident, the bulk of the looted money was recovered from the accused. , All the witnesses of the prosecution, whom he served, were clearly discharged against the intoxicated food, the accused said that his lawyer had been able to identify his innocence in the incident. He did not offer any argument, but he only discussed the punishment and the punishment for being punished. The accused was punished with the maximum punishment provided for these crimes, from constant to harmony. And because he did not deserve any relaxation due to the severity of the sentence, the prosecuting attorney argues that the accused cannot be sentenced for more than 14 years and that the provisions of section 35 (2) ( a) will be infringed. , The CCP called for legal instability in this case, which could be corrected if the convictions in the same case were sentenced to six counts of various offenses. Ordered to run concurrently, rather than to have the court consistently take illegal action. Failure to provide any penalty in case of default of payment of penalty imposed on the accused failed to provide any penalty for non-payment of compensation under Section 44 Court AA, PC High Court ruled that , Sentenced to 6 more years in prison
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
