EHSAN-UL-HAQUE versus EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, AHMADPUR CANAL DIVISION AHMADPUR EAST
Section 2 (b) Punjab Civil Servant Pension Rules, 1963, R1 8 (a) (b) Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitution Petition Receiving Money from Pension of Employees After 11 Years of His Retiring Person Who had retired. Service / Civil Servant Expression did not fall within the scope of the expression \ Applicant / Employee had no alternative remedy against this defective order except according to Article 199 of the Constitution Certificate issued to the employee by the Authority at that time. To establish the constitutional jurisdiction of the High Court. His retirement showed that he had been given a clean chit, nothing was on record to show that the employee was never served any notice of cause or any departmental action during his service. No charge sheet was submitted or 11 years after his dismissal inquiry was submitted No further inquiry can be made against the employee's retirement-related employee instability a year later as indicated in R's compliance. Disciplinary action against 1 8 (b) employee of Punjab Civil Servant Pension Rules, 1963, if any, against a retired government employee Services on the inquiry it stood without any charge related to the charge sheet before being suspended. After 11 years of retirement from the job as a legitimate court proceeding, he was investigated illegally, without the authority of the law and was not sustainable in his eyes, the employee was released to recover the money from his pension. Letter, illegal, violated pension rules and set aside \ r \ n
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
