Section 497 (5) of the Unlawful Dispossession Act (XI of 2005), Section 3 illegal property possession bail may be revoked if it has been properly approved, without giving its reasons. Or crooked or for wrong reasons. Or the defendant tried to tamper with the prosecution's evidence and interrupted the investigation. The suspects had threatened witnesses and tried to commit the same crime. Or if he fails after the grant of bail, if the order of bail was without jurisdiction, without the compulsory provision being granted, the High Court has the right to entertain the petition under section 497 (5). There were enough options, CCP's lawyer for the petitioner / complainant claimed that the accused were influential persons, trying to tamper with the prosecution's evidence, but no document was produced by the complainant. That such argument was upheld, the order of the non-bailable sanction was not well implemented and the trial The reasons presented by the trial court were well grounded. He declared that the offense under question was irrevocable and that any finding or witnessing at the bailout stage was temporary. And it has no effect and no effect on the trial, in which case the bail was dropped.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
