Section 2 302 (b) definition of evidence of the conviction, the reduction of the necessary details of the incident, was immediately mentioned in the FIR filed immediately, which ruled out any possibility of the accused's false involvement. And it proved that the complainant witnessed the presence of ocular. The account was fully supported by the medical evidence, the complainant who was the real brother of the deceased and the second witness of the prosecution, who was his co-participant, provided a commendable explanation of his presence at the time of the incident. Although he was related to the deceased, the mere fact of the witness was not enough to disprove his evidence. And there was no reason for them to make false allegations in this case. The present prediction was a case of one accused and in such cases, it was impossible for the deceased's relatives and relatives to leave the real culprit and someone Take the place of the innocent. The defense witnesses were ridiculous, not worth considering, otherwise the prosecution's story would seem more plausible, if the defense counsel had kept the prosecution's story with the prosecutor, in which case, would have allowed his case against the accused. Had proved beyond doubt. Under section 2302 (b), the PPC was retained, but its death sentence was changed to a life sentence, in which case
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
