CH. MUHAMMAD SHAHZAD ASLAM NAZ versus SPECIAL JUDGE (RENT), MULTAN
Sections 15, 19 and 22 of the Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Tenant Procedure Affidavit, Disapproval of Competition, Effective Tenant's Approval Requires Deletion of Termination on the grounds that the landlord Has not attached the affidavit with the request. Section 19 (4) of the Punjab Rated Premises Act, 2009 shows that the tenant has to be discharged only if he has shown good reason for recording the oral evidence, the tenant has to prove it. That the objections raised in the extradition request were not kept under the parties' requests. And to prove this, recording of oral evidence was necessary Once the leave was allowed for defense, the landlord had to prove his case and cross the witnesses as well as the landlord himself. Had to go through the scrutiny process, it was necessary to submit the affidavit with the rental application. In the event of the tenant's leave application decision and the landlord's failure to submit an affidavit, the Rent Tribunal C tenant should be allowed to defend the application and it was the maximum penalty that the tenant could pay for it. The infringement of such testimonies can be compiled while the submission of affidavits did not substantiate the contents of the affidavits of the two witnesses through their affidavit, etc., but the Rent Tribunal sought to defend the tenant's eviction request. Allowed The objection to not entering the affidavit became routine after a vacation grant and defense request for defense was to be recorded by verbal evidence and the rental tribunal rightly rejected the affidavit.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
