Section 2 (2 (b) and l e4) Qatil Am, voluntarily committing the robbery, appreciated the evidence that the four policemen who were reported to the police after a delay of 10 hours could not be identified. The prosecution was an extra-judicial confession in which the defendants, along with the two prosecution witnesses, were extradited by the defendants after a delay of 1/2 year after 1 1/2 years. Described the issue of the issue of judicial confession, it was not natural and there were some contradictions in the statements. Two witnesses, who doubted their statements, Was produced, the prosecution could not produce any evidence to show that the witnesses before whom the accused had committed extra-judicial confession knew about the accused, or as they approached them. Or were they enjoying a good standing in the area, such joint extra-judicial confession was not enough to maintain the conviction of those convicted of the death penalty, of any weapon in the FIR Was not mentioned, there was no medical legal report of the deceased. Identify who was taken to the hospital No crime was recovered from the scene of the incident Recovering a gun from an accused provided no power in the case of prosecution in the absence of any vacancy, no firing The second was not responsible. The three accused had no evidence of the case and on the basis of such evidence, the accused could not be convicted or sentenced; the prosecution failed to prove his case against the accused.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
