Find a Lawyer

SHEIKH FASIH-UD-DIN versus MST. HAJRA BIBI

Sections 42 and 54 of the case for declaration and permanent injunction on the ground that the administrator of the municipal corporation had approved a scheme under the Punjab Local Government Ordinance 1979 and the plots belonging to the plaintiffs in the said scheme without any law. Was unilaterally captured. At no charge did the defendants contend that the disputed property was a convenience conspiracy scheme approved by the competent authority's trial court under the defendants' decision Appellate Court dismissed the appeal and the judgment passed by the trial court and Retained the order. The local area survey was prepared based on which necessary orders could be given after hearing by the affected parties. Defendants failed to prove that there was a notification or any other legal document that indicated this. That the colony was legally approved and that the victims were all legal and after the completion of the order in 1994, the legal documents were not in the record by documentary evidence which could suggest from afar that the disputed property. As a facilitator or an open space anytime as a legal facility The allocation was not to indicate any misreading or non-reading of evidence that the High Court dismissed the petition.

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011

• MUHAMMAD SADIQ v. MUHAMMAD FAROOQ 2011 CLC 793
• MUHAMMAD ZULFIQAR v. SNOBER PERVEEN 2011 MLD 799
• ASHFAQ HUSSAIN v. GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB 2011 PLC(CS) 799
• RUSTAM KHAN v. State 2011 PCrLJ 802
• NADEEM v. State 2011 YLR 803
• NAWEED AKHTAR CHEEMA v. CHAIRPERSON, TEVETA 2011 PLC(CS) 803
• ALAM SHER MALIK v. MUSLIM COMMERCIAL BANK LIMITED 2011 CLD 806
• MOAZAM ALAM KHAN v. FULL BOARD OF REVENUE, PUNJAB, LAHORE 2011 CLC 809

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2011 →

immigration advocate from Topi lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes