Section 5 and Schedule Transfer of Property Act (IV of 1882), Article 199 of the Constitution of Pakistan Constitutional petition Plaintiff (husband) filed a restitution of marital rights The plaintiff (wife) also recovered Rs 200,000 as compensation. Filed In the contract, both the cases were declared stable judges, the family court dismissed the plaintiff's claim, while the plaintiff's decision was made to appeal the judgment and orders of the trial court. Excluded by a strong verdict. The judge, the Family Court, had no jurisdiction to prosecute the defendant for the collection of damages as the judge could not appear before the Family Court for a compensation of Rs 200,000 due to the payment of the damages. It can only be taken as a simple civil litigation plaintiff that the entry of Rs 200,000 in the marriage contract cannot be called the property of the wife and furthermore that the disputed amount is not included in the rule of actionable claims. Under Section 130 of the Transfer Property Act, 1882, it was considered that the husband's confession was that the case of recovery of the money was not intact because it was not yet the property of the wife and on account of this the husband could recover the money. There was a claim. One of the special conditions involved in the marriage was misunderstood because the matter falls under the exclusive jurisdiction of the Family Court because the marriage was amended by the West Pakistan Family Courts Schedule, 1964 (which was amended on 1 10, 2002). There was full support and due to the amendment, Schedule 9, in which the woman has the right to have any right to personal property belonging to the wife.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
