Find a Lawyer

MOAZAM ALAM KHAN versus FULL BOARD OF REVENUE, PUNJAB, LAHORE

Article 164 West Pakistan Land Revenue Rules, 1968, R17 Constitution Pakistan, Article 199 Appointment of a Lemonard Applicant challenged the denial of his appointment as a limber holder on the basis that the applicant's claim was based on the inherent claim. Were eligible for the post. Since his father was a permanent lumberman, it has been revealed that the applicant had left his residence and had moved to the area concerned and had sold his entire land and there were no more landlords in the area. The penalties taken by them could have already been decided by the demand for revenue. Do not be enraged at the constitutional jurisdiction of the High Court

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011

• Sheikh FASIH-UD-DIN v. Mst. HAJRA BIBI 2011 CLC 802
• NADEEM v. State 2011 YLR 803
• NAWEED AKHTAR CHEEMA v. CHAIRPERSON, TEVETA 2011 PLC(CS) 803
• ALAM SHER MALIK v. MUSLIM COMMERCIAL BANK LIMITED 2011 CLD 806
• NAVEED ABBAS v. State 2011 MLD 811
• GUL MUHAMMAD v. ALI MUHAMMAD 2011 CLC 812
• USMAN alias KALOO v. State 2011 PCrLJ 815
• SHAHZAD HUSSAIN v. JUDGE FAMILY COURT, LAHORE 2011 CLC 820

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2011 →

best advocate from Kandhkot lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes