Sections 302/452/34 Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), Section 417 (2A) All charges against a defendant when presented as a prosecution witness, for injury, assault or misdemeanor preparation, The charges have been denied. The complainant denied a large part of his report, the only witness who had retracted the contents of his report and taken a different version. The complaining party had lied to the FIR, but made no attempt to record the correct version. , The court will consider the version that was appropriate for the retrieval of the shotgun with the charges, but to no avail because they were received by the laboratory after a lengthy delay, the statement of the complainant, who was a respected witness Was declared, the complainant cannot help. The best available evidence of the party complainant's aunt, who was told on the spot, was left by the prosecution, which resulted in the prosecution's case because the best evidence to prevent was fatal to the case. The recovery of the case could not be proved because the matter was recovered after a delay of eighteen days and the accused was not recovered from the possession of the FIR, which had been falsely accused by the prosecution witnesses. The accused is believed to have been charged with larceny and there was no overt act against him. There was no case filed by the appellant for allegedly abusing the accused. Appeal against acquittal was dismissed
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2011
