Articles 2 (2 (b) and at 324 Qatil Ahmed) confessed and appreciated the evidence.The evidence of the prosecution's witnesses was in accordance with the FIR and they confirmed its articles, saying that the version of the prosecution's witnesses The plaintiffs were charged with firing 30 bore pistols and Kalashnikov from 30 accused, yet no contradiction or material contradiction was found in their evidence, the statements of the two witnesses. There was a blood feud between the parties which confirmed the statement of the accused under Section 2342, nothing was available for CCP investigation. A. It turns out that the suspects were falsely implicated. ?The two witnesses were also, according to the medical evidence, the recovery of bullets fired by the investigating officer, medically supporting evidence related to the use of Ocular version wea. Medical evidence was with the help of injuries and the nature of the injuries, although no contradiction was identified by the eyewitnesses of the accused by eyewitnesses, but said that their statement was denied. There is no basis at this time, unless the sick will be justified. The witnesses proved that they were capable of making false accusations in this case that the alleged contradictions in the statements of eyewitnesses, which were trivial, would be of no use, as, over time, such minor contradictions If the eyewitnesses are the evidence of the witness. Other circumstances of the case, such as recovery of medical evidence and emptiness, should then be ignored. Ocular evidence is straightforward, truthful and confident
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2011
