Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MST. NASREEN AKHTAR versus MOHSIN ALI


O XVIII, R 17 and O XLI, R 27 Memorandum for the Examination and Production of Additional Evidence O XVIII, R 17, Withdrawal of evidence by the trial court on the CPC trial and appeal under O XLI Regarding allowing additional evidence before the court, R, 27, the CPC did not allow the exception of the common rationale, which was later said to ensure that the parties once presented their evidence and fragments. Not in fragments, however, the court should be given discretion in order to allow evidence. Such clear and broad powers, which are merely to provide full justice, should not be exercised with the Supreme Court in order to allow a party to improve its case or to give the parties an opportunity to forget. Provide another opportunity to provide. Additional evidence to re-testify will certainly give him the opportunity to improve his case and fill in his case.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
immigration advocates from Khurian wala lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.