Section 2302 / Anti 34 Anti-Terrorism, Act (of XX XXI of XXVII), Section Q Qunununununununununununununununununununununununununununun Pro-Pro Pro Pro Pro Pro Pro Pro Pro Pro Code Pro Code Code Code Code Code Was required by law to remove all traces of fear from the accused's mind - to inform him that he was not obliged to make a confessional statement and did not hand it over to the police. Instead, he will be sent to judicial custody whether he made a confessional statement or not, in the present case, the language of the question will be put to the magistrate, suggesting that the accused be the only one He will be sent to judicial custody when he makes a confessional statement, fear of the police does not go away from the mind of the accused as required by law. Ion would not be considered voluntary where the accused remained in police custody before or after recording the confessional statement, the statement by law by the law alleging confession and returning to the police after the value of his confession. Recorded was not recorded. The court allegedly retrieved the pistol on the suspect's identification and showed that the same investigating officer had recovered the same day, but the same pistol sailing on the same parcel cannot be believed on two different parcels at the same time. It was tampered with and subsequently added a parcel number, the testimony of the law, under Article 40 of 1984,
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2011
